|
---- intermediate statement ----
i'm happy with my djx-I. because i checked it first. otherwise i wouldn't have bought it.
i just needed a useful drumbox and some pad sound to accompany my guitarplaying in the first place, when by chance i came across the djx. it performed nicely, lacked all that boring "march, waltz and tango routine", and it was excitingly cheap.
i rated it already some messages ago (4). the djx has some severe drawbacks though (volatile ram settings and no lfo), but seriously, so what, huh?
when i use my djx for pure fun, i get a massive load of that, really. because i like it. i like the voices, (most of) the styles and arrangements. and i like the ease of use.
and i can also create arrangements i never thought of before, because anyone with a dedicated mind can enter or even cross the floating keyboard-synth border with this incredible low cost wonder. all you need is some solid midi sequencing knowhow.
somehow, the djx equals a bad-ass whore. at first glance it's all stylish looks, tempting knobs and buttons, irresistible. once in da house you get fun galore at a bargain, and inspired fiddling produces a convincing heapload of stunning results. all that makes you come and come again. only wimps would complain that viagra's not included here...
anyway, i just had to react to "S from finland". geezus... 1st law of creative fun: check da gear b4 ya buy! if not, then this eminently inadequate attitude surely inflicts the general opinion towards the poor machine afterwards. the djx is a heavenly little keyboard, not a dedicated synth! thank god "S" sold it again, hopefully to someone with a more fitting approach. may peace, love and music be with us 4ever!
kalle
|
