|
just some comments for anyone who may be considering picking up an asr 2nd hand... been using the asr since it came out in late '92... still using it alongside waldorf Q, k5000s, etc.. it's a great beast, has held up well, exceptionally versatile sample-re-shaping architecture, good sounding a/d/a stages (if not the quietest), superb keyboard feel and playability... however there are some (shockingly incorrect) bits of mis-information in some of the posts on here that i feel should be pointed out to avoid confusion for anyone trying to understand what the asr is capable of... so keep the following in mind:
A) you can't burn audio cds from it; the asr does not support such devices (support was never coded into its OS). in fact, the asr is not entirely compatible with all cd-rom drives; be sure to refer to www.chickensys.com in their knowledge base section when purchasing scsi devices for it. It uses a proprietary (non-dos) filesystem - chicken systems has further information.
B) the only analog signal path in the asr is at the input and output stages. There are no analog filters here, everyone. The effects are entirely in the digital domain. The only ensoniq boards with analog filters (curtis, actually!) were the mirage and esq-1... however, the asr's filters sound very musical and warm, even tho they aren't resonant.
C) you may eventually have to remove the back (bottom) of the sampler at some point and (gently and properly) re-seat some of the socketed chips near the powersupply, especially the 68xxx's high and low rom chips... because of the changes in heat between on and off, the unit can suffer from chip creep... in warm climates (even here in montreal in the summer) it can run at _very_ hot temperatures... i leave it on all the time to minimize the temperature shifts. In other words, if the asr is giving a lot of strange "error 122 - reboot?" messages or whatever, you may just have to pop the top rather than take it in to be $erviced.
D) it can be a (standard) 16 channel midi controller. Not 128. Only 1 midi output jack ;-)
it is strikingly different from modern samplers, both in sound and user interface ;-) ... one should keep in mind that "state of the art" should never apply as a deciding criterion for a _musical_instrument_... it's not a cellular phone.... a stratovarius is hardly new, technics' sl-1200's are a 20-year old design, dopfer's modular systems aren't based on NASA technology ... there is a reason the asr is still respected, and it has to do with its' sound, color, and personality... some of the modern samplers and synths will still be respected 10+ years from now much like the asr for the sorts of reasons just mentioned; however, many will be easily forgotten as well. Anyone still using the roland DJ-70 or U-20? hehe. didn't think so.
I no longer use the asr live, as it had a very busy decade... newer equipment _is_ more reliable, if without as much personality and individuality. Except the neuron. :-)
caveat emptor ;-)
|