 |
|
|
|
Average rating:
4.5 out of 5
|
|
Quite nice in the WYHIWYT (What You Hear Is What You Tweak) department. Got mine for $140 a couple of years ago but I really feel it's overpriced these days. Good pads/sweeps/bass sounds.
|
|
very very fat analogue monster !
|
|
I've recorded it in the studio and used it live. I think those old synths are so much easier to deal with onstage than newer synths. You didn't have to have an engineering degree to make some sounds with the Juno 106. It produced good clear stereo sound and had some very nice effects. It didn't do any justice to any timbral intruments such the piano or guitar, but the string sounds kick most of my sampled strings to death. I like my 106.
|
|
The Juno 106 works very well in many typical settings where an analog sound is required (bass, pads, etc.). They stink if you don't know how to program a basic analog synth. One of the best sounding and most interestingly produced new records right now is Madonna's new CD (believe it or not), and I just read that the main synth on it was a 106. Yes, Virginia, it really does sound better than Acid Fran's ass.
|
|
THIS SYNTH IS ABLE TO DO EVERYTHING THAT YOU WANT IT'S PERFECT FOR THE REAL TECHNO HOBBIST LIKE US....
|
Add your review of the Roland Juno 106 Synthesizer
NEW SYSTEM - to keep the user reviews focussed, we are now approving all submissions before they appear.
We will endeavour to process your comments within 24hrs
Please keep your reviews on topic.
Questions, requests for manuals, ongoing conversations and inappropriate comments are not reviews, and will not be approved.
Manuals can often be found on the links section for this model.
If you want to chat or ask questions, visit the Gas Station, the dedicated user forum here at Sonic State.
|
