|
I bought my 1080 years ago and was extremely happy with it...
but now, i seem to find a lot of shortcommings: 1. the filters are crap! they are extremely analog-a-like (which is good) but
when pushing the resonace up far enough you (and the cutoff down) you get
a lot of DIGITAL distortion...(specially in 24dB mode!)
if it were analog distortion, this would be a good
thing, but digidistdirt sounds terrible! 2. the lfo's (although ahving a lot of waveforms and options) are not able
to go fast enough... when put in maximum rate, they still don't come into
the hearing range ( at about 24Hz-> ) so am-mod. is out of the question... 3. lack of pwm... however, the manual says you can sort of simulate it with
the 'wave gain' parameter etc. i have however found a better way to do it...
take a saw-wave in partial1 and an inv.saw-wave in partial2. because of
phase-cancellation of the two waves you would 'officially' hear nothing... but because of little delay's and thingies in the dsp-engine, they are not
completely phase-locked (or sync-ed)... adding some random-pitch to one of
the partials, or adding some analogue feel to them helps to... because of the phase-cancellation and the none-synced-ness of the sound, the
resulting wave is a square-a-like wave with varying duty-cycle ratio's -> a
pwm function! remember, if you're doing this, the other setups (pan, filter etc.) must be
exactly the same for the 2 partials! 4. the ring-mod really sucks! you can actually hear the original signals!!! the synth is however still very impressive...
|