 |
|
|
|
Average rating:
3.0 out of 5
|
|
fantom xr is full of great sounds but to get there you have to do a lot and i mean a lot of editing which thankfully is quite easy to do on xr after taking a while to get the lay of the land. piano, strings brass and organ sounds on xr are far more realistic than the triton extreme of which i have one as well, but the extreme sounds are just so much better processed and punchier, xr can sound a bit thin. the programming team at roland are quite simply not bothering to programme, they are leaving it up to the individual. dont get me wrong the xr is way ahead of triton extreme for recording as sounds are more authentic if you have the time in the studio to do the tweaking, and i cant imagine anyone using too many of the acoustic sounds on the triton extreme for recording, but who wants to waste time tweaking and editing? sounds should be there when you select presets. for live work triton is the way to go, sounds just cut through so much better for studio xr can sound so much more like the instument you are trying to mimic
|
Add your post to the Roland Fantom X7 thread
You can post reviews, comments or questions here and SUBSCRIBE to the thread via email.
Comments are moderated by humans, please be patient.
|
Copyright Sonic State Ltd. 1995-2012. All rights reserved.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express
written permission from Sonic State is prohibited.
About us -
Ad enquiries -
Contact -
Privacy Statement
|
|
|
|
