|
I traded the buggy (but SUPERB sounding) E-mu XL-7 for the older 505 plus enough cash to justify it. Here are my intial impressions: I LOVE the interface on the 505. I know that the word 'intuitive' is thrown around in synth circles like 'If you love me you'll do it' is in a frat house, but the 505's slider / button / knob-based interface minimizes menu scrolling and allows for a more hands-on management style of track levels, pans, dedicated FX and whatever...
Yeah...even when I first heard the 505 in early '99 it sounded dated. And there isn't a whole lot of deep synth architecture for the creation of your own patches, aside from ADSR, cutoff and res and other basic parameters. BUT THE DRUMS ARE GREAT. Even the patterns aren't entirely horrible. However, severe and even minor edits of the patches, coupled with lots of 'verb and knob-love will produce some pretty credible sounds from a box that sounded old the minute it hit the showrooms.
You only get 8 tracks, with one dedicated percussion track, and I'm still trying to figure out how to avoid reverbing, say, a classic, snappy 909 snare and hats without having the same reverb muddy up the kick because it's all on the same track (I used to run my kicks on the first track of higher-tracked seqs and the rest of the percussion on tracks 2 and 3). I can assign filters to individual percussion parts, but not reverb and delay? I must be missing something (anyone?). 8 tracks isn't a whole lot to work with, I know. But the sequencer functions of the 505, in my opinion, smoke the rm1x and the newer, buggier xl / mp or yammie rs7. This is beyond a doubt the most live-friendly beatbox ever.
I know Roland and their 'groove-approved' products get slagged by the MIDI cowboys with dedicated hardware setups. Maybe they're right. But at the end of the day you have to respect a box like the 505 for doing EVERYTHING except sampling in passable form for about $650 US on the used circuit. If I had ten grand lying around I'd have racks full of sh*t, too.
But before I forget, I must say: FACTORY PATCHES SUCK. I mean, ALL factory patches are pretty dismal, no matter the unit, but the 505's are beyond hope. If I were Roland I'd try to ignore my patch programmer like a retarded uncle. The leads are like dead fish..the pads like sandpaper. Basses are as fat as my crackhead barback...but then again it is PCM and Roland really can't be faulted for that. And at the end of the day, we don't buy synth gear so much for it's out-of-box sound but for it's overall potential.
Oh yeah, and customer support is about as enjoyable as pulling teeth with garden shears.
In all, I love the 505, nestled nicely between my controller, Orbit, dr-202 and other boxes. It is my Main Sequencer...and I love it because I am primarily a MUSICIAN, not a DJ (gonna catch hell for that one)...and the 505 allows me to translate my ideas to sonic reality with a minimum of menu diving, obfuscating synth jive operation manuals or otherwise hindering BS like SO MUCH of my other gear. You'd think that a non-dedicated box that does everything reasonably well would be the real b*tch of the rig...but in fact it's leagues easier to use than most of my purpose-built sound modules. And THANK GOD FOR LO-FI.
To steal a quote: "THIS IS MY SYNTH. THERE ARE ARE MANY OTHERS LIKE IT BUT THIS ONE IS MINE. I MASTER MY SYNTH, AS I MUST MASTER MY LIFE."
|