|
The alternative uses of this machine justify it's existance, if you're simply going to use this as it was probably intended aka, cheese rave patterns etc, presets galore, and techno which is worse than the awful Whitney Houston/Cher etc. endeavours into dance music.
But as a sequencer and drum machine it seems this machine can be an intresting and in my opinion a very useful tool. Just a word to the wise, i'd buy other gear before I'd buy this box, as it will never be the epicenter of your midi studio, moreover it can and will be a useful tool for quickly getting ideas/beats sequenced, heck for the price nothing beats it (pun intended.). Heck even a used mc-50 will cost you probably more than what these go for.
My pluses: Useable drums/drum computer, quick easy sequencing, buckets of pcm sample (most are decent to average), good/fair midi timing, some good efx, real time controlls, and really just ease of use.
My negatives: Weird and sometimes erratic timing (can be a benefit too), sounds are ok but a lot will sound very stale, worst complaint: lack of external storage and only 30k notes held within, and if you add any filter or setting changes real time the 30k notes goes down to a measly 4 or 5k of notes, which is pathetic. why on earth did roland stick 80 million cheesy presets in the machine, and limit the internal storage to almost nothing, seems to me they wanted to please everyone from kids with no musical knowledge or skills (preset mongers), and at the same time offer just enough features to make it useful to real gigging and original artists like myself. Also the filters are quite bland and weak, not bad but not as good as they can be, see a waldorf synth for an example of a really good digital filter, it can be done roland opted to cut corners I think probably in a vein effort to save money.
All in all this box has as much going for it as it has going against it, sort of a yin yang affair, only thing I suggest is to ignore all of the ridiculous hype and make your own decisions about it.
-Nubey
|