|
WALDORF PULSE
Features:
*Three Oscillators with variable waveforms,pulse with variable pulse width, saw, triangle *Cross modulation (pulse waveform that is xor-ed with oscillator 3) *Oscillator sync *Waldorf 24 dB lowpass filter with resonance up to self-oscillation, frequency range 25Hz to 35kHz. *100 programs, divided into 59 ROM presets, 40 user programs and one random sound *Two envelopes each with selectable trigger modes *Two LFOs with different waveforms, tri, sin, saw, pulse, sample&hold *LFO frequency range from 0.008 Hz up to 261 Hz internal Arpeggiator tempo from 50bpm to 300bpm note values from 1/1 dotted, 1/1 tuplet, 1/1, 1/2 dotted, 1/2 tuplet ... to 1/32 note *16 predefined rhythm patterns *All parameter changes sent/received as MIDI controller *Four routable modulation units with adjustable source, amount and destination *Large 3 x 7 segment LED display six knobs and four buttons for convenient editing *19" 2HE Rackmount *Stereo Line out *MIDI In/Out/Thru *External 12V DC Power supply
If your looking for a modern analog monosynth within an affordable price range...then look no further. I always use analog monosynths for bass, lead, fx duties....
The Pulse, in my mind is a great little mono and it sits comfortably along side the SCI Pro-One and Korg Mono/Poly.
I totally recommend the Pulse to anyone who wishes to experience true analog sound without taking the risk of vintage gear.
If you are looking for decent bass, leads and quirky effects (e.g. wet bubbles, blips/bleeps etc etc) then the PUlse should be on your wish list. True analog synths are ALWAYS better for creating raw/in your face kinda sounds. VA synths do not have the same level of presence......
To put that into context I use My setup includes:
OK, the Pulse is a good analog mono......but how does it compare to Pro-One's, Mono/POly's etc etc. Well, I have all 3 and the differences are:
|
listings
