Synth Site: Korg: Mono/poly synthesizer: User reviews Add review

Advertisment
 

Gas Station topic: Korg
Average rating: 4.5 out of 5
nordlead4 a part-time user from singapore writes:
kick ass tone from this synth..brought it at around $400us. if u ever get ur hands on one, buy it. Unless u got that kind of money for moog. the only thing have take note is that it generate alot of heat.. cannot imagine my set up without it,nice fat dirty tone from this baby.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Saturday-Aug-23-2003 at 05:37
tomb from here writes:
folks_ this synth brings home the cows with the best price/performance ratio out there. how can you resist this synth @ 400$? while people are out there selling arp odysseys and ms 20s for a grand? if you are here reading this, i tell you, the secret cult of this synth is not bogus hype. the users of this synth love it for a reason. if you have grand to toss, buy this, then with the other 600$, but lots of wierd paia or blacet or frostwave stuff, and patch it into that rear panel. definitely build some voltage controllers out of alarm clocks or something and make this thing sound like a retarded pig being tied down. fire a nasty drum loop through the trigger inputs and make it stutter. this synth is begging to be expanded into a poor mans modular analog atrosity! download the service manual and f**k this little brat up. add some new inputs on the back. many great sounds in there already, but this synth wants to go where no man has gone before, and can if you have the imagination.

long live cheap, brilliant korg stuff.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Tuesday-Aug-05-2003 at 17:22
Andrew a professional user from Singapore writes:
MOst people use the MONOpoly for DANCE, and esp bass.

I had a monopoly, some 7 years ago... its a beast. the sounds are so dirty, fat, organic and REALLLY RAW. Try using the monopoly for some progressive rock, or hard rock stuffs. you make your band sounds cool. Some of Van Halen's old records uses the MONOPOLY. (im not too sure, but it sounds certainly like it!)

how i wish i can get my monopoly back..

and if you have one, keep it. the synth doesnt rust that badly... just take care of the wood.

Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Tuesday-May-27-2003 at 13:45
n0303 a hobbyist user from atl , usa writes:
I have been playing guitar for about two years. A few months ago I finally decided to merge my love with dance/industrial/electronic music with my growing talents. At that time I researched several synths and I have ended up with a very diverse collection. I just got the monopoly today and I can already tell you, I dont think this synth will ever leave my studio. It has great analog " grit " which has to be due to the four analog vco's . All of my other vintage gear has dco's and there is no comparision. My esq1 sounds dark, my k3 chimey, matrix-6r/1000 combo big but not phat. This guy sound dark, medium phatness which is nice, i bet it wont over power the mix. The sounds seem to be very daft punk'ish, at least that is what it puts me in mind of. Being able to latch the arp, and then play around with the res, filter frequency, portamento, and other knobs is simply brilliant. Also this thing has the best sounding sync I have heard with all four oscs jamming in unison. Simply a great piece of kit, not overated at all.

posted Wednesday-May-21-2003 at 16:09
sexo modular from zurich, switzerland writes:
superbe synthesizer, good controll possibilitis in every aspect, great tone, nice filter, you can set up the whole range of sounds as you can expect from an analogue synth. good arpegiator, chord memory, effect section (sync and x-mod) witch i really like, real good performing synthesizer

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Oct-30-2002 at 03:53
rick wright a part-time user from ummagumma writes:
great machine.all the virtual stuff like the jp8000 or the ms2000 are nothing more than a good joke compare to this

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Thursday-Sep-26-2002 at 10:19
Bakis Sirros a part-time user from Greece writes:
what can i say about it???i really love this beauty!i use it on almost every track.it has a wonderful, fat ,warm sound and many possibilities for sound experimentations,too!one of my favourite monosynths!!!and i have MANY real analog synths and a huge modular,too.so,i know what FATNESS and WARMTH really mean.;-)

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Sunday-May-26-2002 at 18:33
Jan Eugen Hansen a hobbyist user from Norway writes:
I realy like this synth,its like having a modular synth.It can do everything from drummachine,fxbox,leadsynth. Mine is coupled to a Roland CSQ 600 sequenser. In my collection i also have MiniKorg 700S,Roland MC 202,Clavia Nord Modular,Quasimidi Raveolution 309,Quasimidi Raven Max.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Saturday-Oct-06-2001 at 12:19
sjmojo a professional user writes:
i owned a mono/poly for about 3 years,that time i only had a tascam potra one 4track cassette,a boss de200 delay w/ real-time sampling(2 sec),a tr707 and thats all my gears.mono/poly was limited,so i have to layered the sounds by dub-recording way.but it's interesting to use only one synth to do songs.the metallic efx is the greatest thing of monopoly,don't expect fat bass or leads on it,it is not and never will be a minimoog or odyssey.though its got 4oscs and unison mode.it looks good,really looks better than its older brothers,ms10 or ms20,but,only looks i mean.the other great function is the cv/gate interface which differs from other korg's cv/gate system ,it's the only korg synth which used oct/v and v-trg(like all roland,obie,arp,sci,etc...) so u can save some money for buying a more simplified midi-cv interface(mpu101,etc) if u don't have other korg/yamaha,moog synths).for this ,can be rated to 3 though its got limited sonic quality.oh,yes,don't forget the minimal arpeggiator,everyone needs one at that time.

Rating: 3 out of 5 posted Tuesday-Jun-05-2001 at 07:16
Lava from the molten core of Earth writes:
The Mono/poly is amazing. It takes years to discover all of its hidden idiosyncrasies and functions. If you take the time to dissect every control and see what it does, by itself, you will find so many more ways to warp the sound; there are lots of signal paths that are not immediately obvious in the slightest. The Mono/poly mountain is a hard long climb, but once you're at the top, it's the best view...

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Tuesday-Jan-23-2001 at 19:45
nubey a professional user from usa writes:
Fine synth, only tooled around with one a friends practice space -- made cool Dr. Who space noises, VCO's are your friend..

What I really wanted to say is: Chirst you guys write some excellent detailed reviews, you're obviously quite smitten with the ol' MonoPoly, too bad I don't own a newspaper or something I'd have to offer you a job... (hehe)

-Nubey

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Dec-27-2000 at 13:13
whizzkid a professional user from outahere writes:
Hmmm... Reviews seem to differ a lot.

Well, i simply can't imagine why there're so many freaks who spend 2 hours on a synth and then tell you it's crap... That's very very stupid indeed.

I've owned my MP for almost 2 years now and i'm really satisfied with it's performance. I'm not going to repeat what others have already said and to list it's features, i just want to post my comments on it's sonic power. I believe it's one of the best monosynths out there. In every aspect. Many of you say it's not fat/warm. That's not true. No, it doesn't give the immediate satisfaction that a moog does. It may be a reason of moog's popularity, because you have to be a genious to make a moog sound thin or boring. Anyone can tweak some pots on a moog and get that classic warm lead or punchy bass. It's idiotproof. Now turn to a monopoly. At first sight it seems to be a monster knobular machine, so you might expect terrific sound from this box. You turn it on and... oh no, it's thin and plain. very uncovincing. you play with knobs and it still sounds plain. oh, of course there're pretty cool FX, but that's not what you expected to have, you'll prefer a 2600 or an MS20 for that stuff any day. And you're about to get rid of the one... wait! This was my first impression. I really wanted to discharge that crap next day. and on the third... but i was wise enough to hesitate. On the fourth day i discovered a gold mine. What a rich palette of sounds... anything you name it. But it's unlikely that you make a good sound by accident. You have to know exactly what you're doing. Monopoly hates careless attitude, it will aslways sound thin if you treat it like a moog. Knowledge comes with experience. You must be especially careful when setting levels of VCOs, no other synth is SO delicate in this aspect. That's a way to create some really beefy basses and leads. PWM is also worth taking care of. I used to be a collector of monosynths and now have a mini, a 2600, an MS20+MS50, an odssey and a Prophecy and also have access to new-generation analog synths like ATC-1, Pulse or nord modular. I sold my Pro-one and sh-101. Only MP and minimoog do compete in terms of sonic power. If you compare them one by one, without any processing, mini will win easily. But who the hell listen to a single monosynth in a song? Even in a pretty basic arrangement one can make the MP to produce leads or basslines identical to those of a moog. I made this experiment myself and recoreded a Monopoly + guitar + bass drums rock song and took it to a seasoned rec engineer for evaluation. He assured me that the bassline in the begining and the lead came from a mini! So why the hell spend a thousand bucks on a thing which can be outperformed by cheaper equipment? Yes, the mini is overrated... uhmm, overpriced, that sounds better. And it's indispensible, sort of. And I will never sell mine. But if I was forced to have only one monosynth it would be the monopoly. With the monopoly you have warm sound, 4 VCOs, good modulation routings, quite a flexible architecture, and even 4-note polyphony for some basic chords! And what does a mini have besides the remarkable sound? Yes the sound is the main point for a synth, but any sane person will agree that the sound of a mini is not 3 times better than that of a MP (unlike the price). Modern analogs are good and far more flexible and offer more control over the sound, but if I was to pick the best non-modular non-midi vintage analog monosynth the monopoly would be it. Period.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Dec-27-2000 at 09:51
James K. a part-time user from USA writes:
I don't understand how anyone could label the Mono/Poly as "boring"? This strikes me as very odd--sure, the M/P may not be to your tastes... but BORING???? Flexibility in modulations and routing of the two MG's (LFO's) are one of its strong points. The SSM chips in this thing kills, and the filter sounds great. Plus, you can modulate the pitch/sync/filter by the mod wheels (one which is routed to MG2) for more craziness... What about the multiple sync options? What about the choice of triangle/saw/PW/PWM waves on each oscillator? What about the bass compensated SSM filter that resonates at 7? Multiple triggering options? Variable (and negative) filter envelope amounts? The ability to modulate PW by env/MG1/MG2? These are only the things that come immediately to mind.

If this is boring I want to know your definition of an exciting synth!

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Monday-Sep-25-2000 at 13:37
WES from us OFa writes:
well, if you can't get any decent sounds out of this beast your not trying! this thing kills on a variety of levels. the first two times i was able to borrow one over the years, i really did'nt have a clue but now that i own the one i was borrowing it has been a rude awakening indeed! as much fun as an MS20 but totally different and an excellent companion. i'm finding a huge range of sounds that are expressive as hell. if you find one, buy it!!

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Saturday-Sep-23-2000 at 22:10
NUBEY a professional user from USA writes:
Not to diss, but my model one Pro-one (with j-wire keyboard) will eat a mono/ploy alive in terms of bass, dunno why you favor the mono/poly maybe it's a preference, but my pro-one sounds a whole lot thicker than my friends *(my old) mono/poly. Hey I too think they're great boards, but I feel they're a little over-rated too, much rather have a trident2 IMO, great for efx, the modulation is great as mentioned before, they seem sturdy too, much much better than a poly6 or those yucky poly 61's and after, true VCO's make all the difference in the world, be warned though it's not a Jupiter/Oberheim/Moog thick it's a little thin for VCO's but it's a great board, I just didn't have space any more for the monster.

4 marks of 5, they're good but just not great, hope that seems fair.

-Nubey

Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Tuesday-May-02-2000 at 19:22
James Meeker a part-time user from Toledo, USA writes:
Just acquired a virtually flawless Mono/Poly after years of yearning for one. Very cutting and unique, nice construction throughout from the knobs, to the keys (okay polysynth action) to the mod wheels.

There are a number of features that make this synth pretty unique, the first among them being the 4 VCO setup. The sync (2 types) and FM (called x-mod, also 2 types) are excellent-and are triggered by the same orange button labeled "effects". The arpeggiator cycling in poly mode is sonically unique to my knowledge. The use of a positive AND negative pulse on the LFO are interesting. The addition of noise is a great one.

In some ways, the Mono/Poly reminds me of the Prophet 5 or Pro-One regarding implementation of the mod wheels--never since has a synth made mod wheels so easy and so meaningful to the overall sound of the instrument.

Contrary to some belief, the Mono/Poly is NOT unuseable in polyphonic mode; however, this is not one of the machine's strengths except w/ the Arpeggiator running through the different oscillators.

The Mono/Poly is an excellent--nay, AWESOME bass machine, spitting out odd timbres at the drop of a hat. It also can out-bubble and hiss a Yamaha CS-whatever (excluding the 80's, which RRrippp--not bubble) or Pro-One with ease. In general, the Mono/Poly is useful all over the place and in many contexts--conquering all with style and character.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Tuesday-May-02-2000 at 17:27
Moho from the molten core of the earth writes:
The URL for Zen Mono/poly has again changed. Now you can find it at:

www.mohodisco.com/monopoly

Should be a bit more permanent this time.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Monday-Apr-10-2000 at 03:12
Jeremiah M Stanfill a hobbyist user from USA writes:
Since I bought this instrument in 1995 I am still finding new sounds or rediscovering sounds that are quite remarkable even for and especially today in 2000. I will have to disagree with the sound category ratings. It does WONDERFULLY as something in the categories of brass, ACOUSTIC, pads, and PERCUSSION!! Words of advice: all hardware modules on this synth were not designed to be used as they are expected to, maybe. You can be extremely lame and use all modules in their typical use or You can get extremely technical and outlandishly configure them to create far-fetched, avante garde, terra incognita, how-the-where-the-what-the-hell-did-that-come-from type of sounds. Seriously. From the looks of the front panel it looks knock-and-know-all to the typical synth user but due to the technical synth archetecture it really is a synth all of its own...not a transitional, not a consolation, not an accompanying. Find one.

closing comment: Don't abuse the filter. Spare from using the resonance and the filter envelope emphasis by keeping their levels low to mid - You'll find just how beautiful the response of the filter really can be.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Sunday-Jan-09-2000 at 22:14
royce a part-timer user from usa writes:
A good synth that you can find on the cheap. The arpeggio is unsual and syncable to an audio click. The poly mode is strange in that the oscillators share the same filter and envelope, but this can be great for chugging rhythms. Good filter that doesn't quite have enough bite when open all the way. U can route the pitch and mod wheels to pitch, lfo, or filter fc. I replaced the volume knob with a big round dimmer and painted it red. Controlling volume this way makes the instrument much more expressive.

Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Mar-10-1999 at 01:59
Mohorific from the molten core of the earth writes:
I disagree with Ingo's comments about osc instability. My Mono takes about 2 minutes to warm up, but once it's warm it stays in tune nicely. I probably tune my Mono once every six months. Maybe mine is an exception though...

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Thursday-Jan-28-1999 at 14:05
Ingo Roemling a hobbyist user from Germany writes:
I read about "heat problems" of the Mono/Poly, but I can't really agree. Yeah, it gets warm, but not hot. The OSC's are not very stable in tune, and my unit needs about 5 Minutes to warm up and tune up. It triggers nicely via CV, and every day there's a new sound coming out of this wonderful machine. I paid about $400 for it, but I won't regret it. One warning: The keyboard is really crap! I'm not a hard player, but some keys loose function more and more... sigh...

Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Thursday-Jan-21-1999 at 14:41
Mohorific from the molten core of the earth writes:
I agree with FREQUENCY's post- get a MIDI->CV converter for your Mono/Poly; it opens up a whole new world. The Mono is cool because not only can you control the pitch from the CV input, but also the VCO FM input. If you control the pitch via the CV input, the keyboard disengages, the oscillators are forced into UNISON mode, and you cannot transpose. If you control the Mono via the VCO FM in, you lose portamento capabilities, but you are able to transpose on the fly, as well as sequence in CHORD MEMORY/POLY modes. One cool thing that I have done is control the pitch of the Mono from my Korg Trinity with the CV input, then, using another output on my Doepfer MCV4, I route the aftertouch of my Korg Trinity into the VCO FM in. This enables you to play the Mono (from your MIDI keyboard) just as you normally would, except when you press hard to get some aftertouch, the pitch of the Mono wildly fluctuates in steps. It sounds kick ass!! You've got to try it! I'll say it again- I love the Mono/Poly. It is awesome.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Monday-Dec-21-1998 at 14:28
JB a part-timer user from England writes:
I used to have a mono/poly and I liked it so much more than the SH101, MC202 and Pro-One that I had at the same time.

I found a feature on mine that made it sound particularaly good, there was a point between two of the LFO waveshapes that caused the LFO to run at incredible speed, using this as a modulator on pitch and/or filter cut-off created some beautiful clangy timbres. Maybe it happens to them all. Was it just mine that ran at a suprisingly high temperature?

Rating: 3 out of 5 posted Friday-Nov-20-1998 at 10:34
frequency a professional user from u s a writes:
After owning a MONOPOLY for only a few weeks i was astounded to accidentally come across a serious a bleeps and sounds that were so very familiar, after a little bit of fine tuning ad speeding up the lfo and adding some negative envelope generator , then turn up the resonance, and low and behold >>>------------>>> R 2 D 2, seriously, the sound was so close. you have to use the arpegiattor in poly mode to trigger every osc once. i have a kenton pro 2, and its the bomb, i can either play and sequence my MONOPOLY , monophonically, but you get to go to lower/higher octaves with the KENTON, and you can also send incredibly smooth pitch bends and sequence them 2. The kenton makes the MONOPOLY that much fatter, you can even select the speed of the pulse to trigger the arpegiattor making possible some incredible effects especially with the freq mod and x-mod. I l o v e this synth, its definately a classic.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Thursday-Nov-19-1998 at 00:59
Austin Powers a part time user from U.S.A. writes:
I liked it more than the ms-20, this machine is awesome, if only for the brightly colored button that turns the sound from dr.jeckle to mr. hyde

truly killer sound from a small package

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
monkey lewis a hobbyist user from the back of the theatre writes:
well, this little, well, not little...that's precisely it, this synth is amazing because it can crack the bajesus both out of moogs and roland BUT remeber this is a korg. a sound entirely its own. not as wet as a Roland, and not as bright as a Moog...and that arpeggiator is phenomenol. and the chord hold function that plays a chord monophonicaly is super. this lil' bapper is packed with functions...it should complete anyone's monophonic collection it does run hot, but that is nice to know that it is really working hard for you, the knobs on mine are a little looser than I like 'em to be anyway it's cheap to! so why not buy one, cheap is always the way to go with synths, I means after all, no one really needs to spend money on something that makes silly noises, you should just bang on a locker, or kick an animal, or yell into a box, maybe burn someone, or rip some fabric, sound should always be free, but synth are just "confirmed sound" if you say, that you have a prophet 600, a moog prodigy, and an MC-202... you are just confirming to your self and others that you can make noise, but anyone can make noise, I mean slap your inner thigh, or throw a rock at some cans...that is all free, but if free noise isn't enough, and you need to confirm yourself and others that you truly are a "noisemaker" then buy vintage synths, and buy 'em cheap. that is the way of the munke

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
Jonas Brogren a part time user from Sweden writes:
I bought my Mono-Poly in the mid 80´s. At that time it costed 490 USD. Now, I´ve found it in a music store in Sweden. Guess the price ? 1000 USD! Quite much for second-hand electronics.

I like the sound of the M.P. very much, especially the flutelike, Zawinulish sounds which you create with a triangular or narrow PW waveform. You can also get nice hornstab attacks by modulating the

PWM waveform by the EG/filter. Another good thing is that you can modulate the timbre (read filter) by the pitch wheel. It makes your sound very expressive. A sad thing is that you can´t store your programs in a

memory bank. I´ve got a big loose-leaf binder with patches, but of course it takes time to change the patches in a concert. Overall, it´s a good synth, but don´t expect natural keyboard sounds ( even if you can program a good synth-clavinet),

and digital-sounding pads. The fonky bassounds are the baddest!

Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
monkey lewis a hobbyist user from the back of the theatre writes:
well, this little, well, not little...that's precisely it, this synth is amazing because it can crack the bajesus both out of moogs and roland BUT remeber this is a korg. a sound entirely its own. not as wet as a Roland, and not as bright as a Moog...and that arpeggiator is phenomenol. and the chord hold function that plays a chord monophonicaly is super. this lil' bapper is packed with functions...it should complete anyone's monophonic collection it does run hot, but it is nice to know that it is really working hard for you, the knobs on mine are a little looser than I like 'em to be. anyway it's cheap to! so why not buy one, cheap is always the way to go with synths, I means after all, no one really needs to spend money on something that makes silly noises, you should just bang on a locker, or kick an animal, or yell into a box, maybe burn someone, or rip some fabric, sound should always be free, but synth are just "confirmed sound" if you say, that you have a prophet 600, a moog prodigy, and an MC-202... you are just confirming to your self and others that you can make noise, but anyone can make noise, I mean slap your inner thigh, or throw a rock at some cans...that is all free, but if free noise isn't enough, and you need to confirm yourself and others that you truly are a "noisemaker" then buy vintage synths, and buy 'em cheap. that is the way of the munke

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
N8 a part time user from Colorado, writes:
I a monopoly past down from my dad who used it in his rock

band in the early 80's , along with a polysix both of which

I'm now using to produce progressive trance. The monopoly

puts out some crazy sounds through the effects function, most

of which I've never heard on any recording. I've got it patched in

in a couple ways to the polysix, one from the mono trig. out

to the arppegiator of the six, and the mono. CV to the fcM of the

six. It's fun having the two work as one, but I dont have very

much flexibility without sampling power. I do love the sounds I

get out of the monopoly, especially the bass. I dig hitting

a 4 note (in P5's) arpeggio going two 8va's up and down with

effects on and my EG intensity at about -3. It's groovy as hell

and leaves me with so much to manipulate . Keep in mind as you read this

I'm still young and not versed in the ways of synthesis as the big boys

but Ive been experimenting with this synth since I was 15, and I

still find newer phatter sounds. I love the Mono/Poly.

Rating: 0 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
ANDREW MEDINA a professional user from USA writes:
I Think its a wounderful synthasizer ,because of its FMX effects . Sure if you play polka , or classical music or jazz then you have no need for that type of wierd sounds FX. SO DON"T KNOCK IT, Just because you don't know how to use those effects in a creative way Jeremiah M Stanfill.

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
Ryan Anderson a professional user from USA writes:
I've been very satisfied with the performance of this fine gem...the band that I am currently in uses the keyboard quite frequently, and have recorded quite a few projects with it...I enjoy it's ability to go anywhere from a precise polyphonic metronome to a nice wavy wash with the flick of a key...this is analog at it's finest, just before the dawn of MIDI...everyone that I know who has one just kind of ended up with it, I don't know anyone who's actually purchased one...out...

Rating: 0 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
Gifford Brown a hobbyist user from UK writes:
I've had mine for years, and although it's now a bit battered I just can't seem to part with it. One of the oscillators is defunct, and the latch to the arpeggiator won't unlatch once triggered. But pile all the working oscillators together (the 3 that's left) and it's still the fattest

bass sound around. Any ideas on DIY repairs and where to get the spares? A new rubber keypad would also be helpful, as it seems to perish easily

Rating: 4 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
Mohorific a hobbyist user from USA writes:
Totally rocks. If you don't like it, you haven't spent enough time with it to get deep into the wide range of CRAZY noises it can make. I'll never sell mine. Got it used for 250 bucks!

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
AdamT a part time user from UK writes:
I`ve only had a Mono/Poly for a few months and have come to regard it as one of the finest Monos. the flexibility that four oscillators give is awesome even though the tuning controls are too fine. useless as a polysynth but that poly mode gives probably the best setup for arpeggiation. just set the four oscillators for different waveforms/footages/volumes, set the arpeggiator to full range and the keyboard tracking to max and crank up the resonance. Amazing timbral effects as the Arp` cycles thru the oscillators!. the cross Mod DOES give one hell of a sound as Andy says, just experiment. the SSM filter is verrrry warm and huge sounds can be created with ease. the wheels are assignable so no probs there too. reliability is high due to a lack of memories and therefore no battery to leak and wreck the PCBs (big bugbear on the Polysix, the MP`s Poly Brother). Parts availibility is better than you think, the Polysix is based on the same setup but with 6-filters/eg`s etc and scrap P6`s should be plentiful due to the aforementioned battery disease, the Keyboards rubber membrane contact things (and the keys) are the same as the Polysix as well as the awful Poly-61. Down Sides?, not many.. The Mono/poly can be a bit TOO smooth sometimes and the LFO`s can get tied up running the Arpeggiator and the PWM (the Polysix has separate LFOs for PWM, Arpeggiator and normal duties), also there is no LFO delay pot, a useful facility missing from most late Analogs but it IS present on the Polysix (so no excuses??).. These are very minor gripes and the MP is less of a compromise than most others, within a week of getting the Mono/Poly, I sold my Pro-1........ says it all really

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
Nico Boseck a professional user from Alaska,USA writes:
I haven't had this long but I must say it holds up well in the lab even with stellar synthes including MULTIMOOG, Prophet 5, Pro 1. I picked up this classic out in the valley from a rapper who wasn't interested in anything nonmidi(!)

One Question: Does this machine run pretty hot? After an hour my back panel is cooking but all function continue to work...I even like some of the 4 voice poly patches, which the purists seem to dis...

The bottom line for all ANalog FreQs: THIS MOTHER ROCKS !!!!

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43
AdamT a part time user from UK writes:
The Monopoly is excellent but as you say Nico, it does run rather hot.. this is weird as it seems to use the same PSU as the Polysix which has less ventilation and runs cool despite having more circuitry/oscillators/filters etc to deal with.. anyway winter is coming and you`ll be glad if that then (;-).. One point to note.. the keyboard rubber membrane contacts are no longer available in the UK so if they go it`s time to rack it (:-(. Still worth a 5 tho

Rating: 5 out of 5 posted Wednesday-Aug-05-1998 at 23:43

Add your post to the Korg Mono/poly synthesizer thread

You can post reviews, comments or questions here and SUBSCRIBE to the thread via email.
Comments are moderated by humans, please be patient.

Name
Email - not published - required for subscription.
Notify me when this page updates (requires valid email address)
Location
(Country)

Are you a professional part time hobbyist user?

This post is a.. [ review/opinion question answer other]
Your comments: (no HTML)

Rating for this model
1 2 345
your network is: 127.0.0.1 - please don't abuse these reviews

Want Our Newsletter?


More...

Moog At The Super Bowl 

The Avila Brothers talk about their journey to the recent Super Bowl Halftime Show


Modal Is Back - Restructuring Complete 

Website up - Modal app support back too


3 Maverick Synth Makers who Did it for Themselves 

Innovation is the main focus for these builders.


Sega sound for now