Hmmm... Reviews seem to differ a lot.
Well, i simply can't imagine why there're so many freaks who spend 2 hours on a synth and then tell you it's crap... That's very very stupid indeed.
I've owned my MP for almost 2 years now and i'm really satisfied with it's performance. I'm not going to repeat what others have already said and to list it's features, i just want to post my comments on it's sonic power. I believe it's one of the best monosynths out there. In every aspect. Many of you say it's not fat/warm. That's not true. No, it doesn't give the immediate satisfaction that a moog does. It may be a reason of moog's popularity, because you have to be a genious to make a moog sound thin or boring. Anyone can tweak some pots on a moog and get that classic warm lead or punchy bass. It's idiotproof. Now turn to a monopoly. At first sight it seems to be a monster knobular machine, so you might expect terrific sound from this box. You turn it on and... oh no, it's thin and plain. very uncovincing. you play with knobs and it still sounds plain. oh, of course there're pretty cool FX, but that's not what you expected to have, you'll prefer a 2600 or an MS20 for that stuff any day. And you're about to get rid of the one... wait! This was my first impression. I really wanted to discharge that crap next day. and on the third... but i was wise enough to hesitate. On the fourth day i discovered a gold mine. What a rich palette of sounds... anything you name it. But it's unlikely that you make a good sound by accident. You have to know exactly what you're doing. Monopoly hates careless attitude, it will aslways sound thin if you treat it like a moog. Knowledge comes with experience. You must be especially careful when setting levels of VCOs, no other synth is SO delicate in this aspect. That's a way to create some really beefy basses and leads. PWM is also worth taking care of. I used to be a collector of monosynths and now have a mini, a 2600, an MS20+MS50, an odssey and a Prophecy and also have access to new-generation analog synths like ATC-1, Pulse or nord modular. I sold my Pro-one and sh-101. Only MP and minimoog do compete in terms of sonic power. If you compare them one by one, without any processing, mini will win easily. But who the hell listen to a single monosynth in a song? Even in a pretty basic arrangement one can make the MP to produce leads or basslines identical to those of a moog. I made this experiment myself and recoreded a Monopoly + guitar + bass drums rock song and took it to a seasoned rec engineer for evaluation. He assured me that the bassline in the begining and the lead came from a mini! So why the hell spend a thousand bucks on a thing which can be outperformed by cheaper equipment? Yes, the mini is overrated... uhmm, overpriced, that sounds better. And it's indispensible, sort of. And I will never sell mine. But if I was forced to have only one monosynth it would be the monopoly. With the monopoly you have warm sound, 4 VCOs, good modulation routings, quite a flexible architecture, and even 4-note polyphony for some basic chords! And what does a mini have besides the remarkable sound? Yes the sound is the main point for a synth, but any sane person will agree that the sound of a mini is not 3 times better than that of a MP (unlike the price). Modern analogs are good and far more flexible and offer more control over the sound, but if I was to pick the best non-modular non-midi vintage analog monosynth the monopoly would be it. Period.
|