No flash plug
|
QuickTime (MP4) | iOS MP4 Windows Media |
11:17 mins |
Last year Edirol released an updated version, based on the same form-factor, but addressing a few small issues and offering an upgraded performance.
I had my hands on a pre-release version, and did a short video piece at the time comparing the two.
Since, there's been a slew of newer models appearing from other manufacturers, each offering their own take on the now highly-popular pocket recorder format, so there's a bit more competition – we'll see how it stacks up, using our regular 10 criteria, and focussing on use from the perspective of musicians, journalists, and videographers.
I should say at this point, that although I do appreciate the needs of those 'recordists' using portable units to record the highest quality recordings, they usually will have the means to monitor and adjust levels, etc. for maximum fidelity – musicians will more likely use them in a more 'set & forget' style, so ergonomics, on-board mics and limiters come more into play.
It's clear that the R-09 and R-09HR are well-suited for this latter usage – the clear OLED display, and essential transport controls and Big Red Record Button are right on the front of the unit, ready for take-off.
The new unit feels secure in the hand (the original did feel a bit like a bar of soap when things got hot & sweaty ;-) and the resistance to handling noise is excellent.... unlike some we've tested.
It's not all roses, though – the input and playback level controls are small black buttons on the side of a matt black unit - sure looks stylish, but in low light at live gigs I found them very hard to see and use.
And whoever thought a good place for the headphone jack was right on the top of the unit next to the mics, deserves to be beaten round the head with a wet fish. If you have to have anything there (and why, really?) then surely the External Mic socket would make more sense – it would disable the on-board mics anyway when plugged in, rather than introduce the extra handling noise, both from plugging/unplugging and the inevitable movement of headphone cable. It also totally unbalances the unit... Bah!
Yeah, I have a few grumbles for sure – it's not perfect, and there are things I'd love to change, but overall I do really like the Edirol R-09HR – as a no-frills, grab & go pocket recorder, it's hard to beat.
Andy McCreeth
Pricing $399.99/£299.99
| Check the Price - at these online stores. |
| £279.99 Edirol R-09HR @DolphinMusic.co.uk $399.00 Edirol R-09HR 24BIT/96KHZ WAV/MP3 RECORDER @MusiciansFriend.com $59.00 Edirol Leather Case with Stand for R-09HR Recorder @MusiciansFriend.com $399.00 Edirol R-09HR 24BIT/96KHZ WAV/MP3 RECORDER Standard @Music123.com |
Actually, a few years ago Roland released one of the first portable solid state recorders, the R-1. I bought one and used it for a while. It was crudely designed but it worked reasonably well and sounded decent. I still use it occasionally, but I am looking at one of the Zooms as a replacement.
13-May-09 09:35 AM
You guys already had this review up on the News page a few days ago.
PS The the anti-spambot image thing is acting up. When I first get to the comment page, it's a black rectangle. I have to type random letters in and click the go button to get a viewable image.
13-May-09 12:17 PM
yeah, we know - there was a small issue with some audio 'ticking' noises on the Flash render, so we re-did it.
Interesting to know about the spambot - I don't see that; what browser/platform are you running? Thanks for pointing it out.
Andy
13-May-09 01:34 PM
Howard, yes, we missed that one, Edirol put us right, hence the tweaked intro text to reflect that.
Thanks
14-May-09 06:31 AM
Re Low vs High gain recording.
Did you match the levels (or normalize?) in post when comparing the two settings?
The low gain vocal sounded quieter to me.
15-May-09 04:15 AM
Hi Scott - no, I didn't want to normalize in post as it might have affected the sound quality. I boosted the input levels to max, and moved closer to the mics, but the gain structure is quite different and the level was a little quieter. It was meant as a rough & ready realtime demo of how switching Gain settings may affect sound quality.
15-May-09 04:32 AM
Hi Andy,
thanks for the response, then your experience of a flatter sound is a consequence of the level, louder recordings always sound better than quiet ones of the same source. We are less sensitive to low and high frequencies, as I am sure you are aware.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness
As the level drops we lose the low and high sound first…this is what I think you are probably responding to, not a non-linearity of the R09HR frequency response (which your comments imply).
About boosting levels, I appreciate your concern, however you should be able to raise the gain of the Low Sensitivity recording to match the high sensitivity level (not necessarily normalizing, that’s a quick equalizer tho). I am fairly sure once you match playback levels that they will sound the same.
Regards Scott
15-May-09 11:32 PM
I'm back...Andy, please check these two recordings. I grabbed the audio from your video and
1. Here is the original unmatched High-vs-Low sensitivity recordings:
www.digifishmusic.com/public/sounds/SonicState_R09HR_MicHigh_vs_MicLow_Original_Levels.mp3
The second does sound flat.
2. Here is the second section with levels matched with the first:
www.digifishmusic.com/public/sounds/SonicState_R09HR_MicHigh_vs_MicLow_Matched_Levels.mp3
Problem solved methinks.
PS: I fixed your popping 'P' on 'input' too you may notice :)
This is an interesting issue that I have seen catch many new users of DAWs who think one DAW sounds better than another. 99% of the time there are level differences between the two packages that cause the issue. Level is a red-herring.
Regards
15-May-09 11:50 PM
When can we expect the rest of the videos ?
27-Jul-09 12:33 AM